![]() | GMS 3.02 |
|---|
There are many ways to host a hybrid meeting.
The following suggestions are based on experience and the comments from fellows on what they felt worked and didn't.
Concerns about anonymity are paramount and addressed throughout.
If the space lacks appropriate display technology, a video monitor ideally wall-mounted is the best option. And a room that is large enough to c accomodate 40-60 participants would benefit from a larger screen.
We may also need a wall mount bracket, the better to see our remote participants.
The Mounting Dream Tilting TV mount MD2268-MK (left, fits most 26-55 Inch LED TVs), can be found for less than $40.
We expect Zoom participants to be fully engaged in the meeting, to be seen and heard.
Laptop speakers cannot adequately project their voices in a room that can accommodate 60 people, to say nothing of sound quality.
If the space lacks appropriate sound reinforcement, we recommend a sound bar as a solution. Positioned (mounted?) to work in tandem with the video monitor. it will better contextualize the speaker than options.
Are there small Bluetooth solutions? Sure. The soundbar form factor has another benefit, it's less uh, portable.
The In-Person Tech Chair would be the Zoom host for the meeting. As such s/he will need to access the full host feature set.
The host will otherwise need very limited functionality:
Ground Control to Major TomThe Zoom host will need to be in direct contact with co-hosts and Zoom participants. This lightweight headset minimizes ambient (room) noise, enabling the host to keep her feet in the circle and her head in the cloud. |
|
The In-Person Meeting Chair and in-person attendees will need to communicate effectively with the participants on Zoom and vice versa.
Room mics pick up room noise, and do a poor job of capturing the contributions of fellows in the far corners of the space.
Bluetooth microphones seemed like a reasonable solution, but the options we found were expensive, over-engineered and/or had an inappropriate form-factor.
One fellow commented in the poll that having a room camera was unsatisfying, as it was difficult for people online to pick out individuals in-person.
We understand that not everyone at an in-person meeting wishes to appear on-camera. OTOH some participants want to speak to their online fellows face-to-face.
Using a tablet to log into Zoom at the in-person meeting, addresses all of these concerns. At a minimum the tablet acts as a handheld microphone. By switching its camera on or off, in-person participants can enable greater intimacy or elect to protect their anonymity.
Is this strictly necessary? Certainly in-person participants can log in to the meeting on their phones if those they choose. However, this approach has a few downsides.
First, to be on the phone, is to not be present in the meat-space meeting. Use of the tablet allows the rest of the room to be present for the person sharing and connected with the Zoomers.
While the room does have WiFi, it is limited. Connecting to two datastreams (the laptop and tablet) uses much less bandwidth than connecting to laptop, tablet and 20 or 30 phones. an approach that diminishes the quality of the experience for everyone.
It's not all WiFi and Bluetooth however. Except for the headset, all of these devices need power. Some may require a hard line connection.
While the details will vary with the facility, we can expect to need at least some of the following: